Running on Empty
The Silent Recession: What the Data Has Been Telling Us All Along
The headline numbers look fine. Markets are up. Average 401k balances hit record highs. GDP held together. The official story is one of resilience, a soft landing, an economy that bent but didn’t break.
But there’s another story running underneath it, told in different numbers. In hardship withdrawals tripling from their pre-pandemic levels. In cardboard box shipments falling to multi-year lows. In 68% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck. In a jobs market where almost every month of apparent growth dissolves on revision.
The question isn’t whether the economy is struggling. It’s whether we’re willing to say so out loud.
The Tax Return That Didn’t Change Much
This year, the IRS adjusted income tax brackets upward by roughly 2.8%, and the standard deduction increased by nearly 8% when factoring in the One Big Beautiful Bill. On paper, Americans should be keeping more of what they earn.
In practice, the relief is being quietly consumed before it’s felt. Gas prices are up. Grocery costs remain elevated well above pre-pandemic levels. Tariff-driven price increases are flowing through to everyday goods. For most working households, the modest tax benefit isn’t a windfall. It’s a slight offset against a rising tide of costs — and for many, it doesn’t even reach that.
The people who wait until April to file are typically the ones who owe money, higher earners, the self-employed, small business owners. What their payments reveal is a far more accurate picture of real economic activity than the headline data suggests.
When April tax receipts come in below expectations, as they well may, it won’t just be a revenue story. It will be a signal about what taxable income, business profits, and capital gains actually looked like in 2025. And that signal will be hard to ignore.
Jobs: The Numbers Behind the Numbers
February’s employment report lost 92,000 jobs, nearly double the expected loss. The headline was blamed on the Kaiser Permanente strike, which temporarily pulled over 30,000 healthcare workers off payrolls during the BLS survey week. March bounced back to 178,000, and the narrative quickly became: temporary disruption, nothing to worry about.
But look closer. The March rebound was almost entirely mechanical, those same Kaiser workers returning to their jobs, counted again as newly employed. Strip out that reversal, and the underlying trend is what it’s been for over a year: essentially flat. Healthcare has been the lone sector sustaining any job growth, and even that buffer is now fragile.
There has been essentially zero job creation in the past six months. The labor market may be moving from merely bent to genuinely broken.
Meanwhile, federal employment has shed over 330,000 positions since October 2024, 11% of the total federal workforce. Long-term unemployment has reached its highest average duration since December 2021. And prior months keep being revised downward, quietly erasing gains that were never as real as they appeared.
The jobs picture is not one of recovery. It’s one of stasis masking deterioration.
Where the 401k Story Gets Complicated
The average 401k balance rose 11% in 2025, and that number has been cited widely as proof that American retirement security is holding up. What it actually proves is that markets went up, and that paper gains look the same regardless of whether the underlying economy is healthy.
Underneath those averages, a different story is playing out. Hardship withdrawals hit 6% of participants in 2025, three times the pre-pandemic norm. More than 19% of participants now carry outstanding loans against their accounts. And critically: fresh payroll contributions from working and middle class Americans appear to be stagnating or declining, even as automatic enrollment inflates participation numbers.
The market gains inflate balances for everyone, including people simultaneously raiding their accounts out of desperation. The average masks the stress completely.
According to the Brookings Institution, a third of middle-class families now cannot afford the basic triad of food, housing, and childcare. These are not people increasing their retirement contributions. These are people deciding whether to tap what they’ve already saved just to cover this month.
Survival Spending and the Disappearing Consumer
Consumer spending data continues to show resilience at the top line. What it doesn’t show clearly is who is doing the spending. The affluent segment, the top 10% of households, now accounts for approximately 50% of all US consumer spending. What the middle and lower income brackets are doing looks very different.
Spending has consolidated around essentials. Groceries. Gas. Utilities. Basic home goods. Discount retailer visits are up, not as occasional bargain hunting, but as routine. Private label products are booming. Consumers are trading down within categories, buying smaller quantities, clipping coupons, and delaying every purchase that isn’t urgent.
The headline spending numbers look resilient because consumers are finding ways to maintain their lives while spending less. That’s not strength. That’s adaptation under pressure.
The average US household now holds just $9,869 in readily available cash, down 10% from 16 months ago. For households already struggling to pay monthly bills, that figure drops to $2,336. The savings buffer that kept consumer spending alive through 2023 and into 2024 is nearly gone.
The Fed’s Impossible Position
The Federal Reserve held rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75% in March, marking its second pause in 2026. The decision reflects an institution caught between two fires it cannot fight simultaneously.
On one side: a weakening labor market, declining consumer purchasing power, and the quiet beginning of what may already be a recession. The traditional response is rate cuts, loosen monetary policy, stimulate growth.
On the other side: inflation running above target, oil prices elevated from Middle East conflict, and tariff-driven cost pressures still flowing through supply chains. Rate cuts in this environment risk reigniting price increases that would devastate the same households already struggling.
Supply-side shocks push weakening GDP growth and rising inflation simultaneously — pushing the two prongs of the Fed’s dual mandate in opposite directions. That’s what always puts the Fed in a bind.
The textbook answer doesn’t exist here. The Fed can protect employment or protect price stability. It cannot fully do both. And with Chair Powell’s term expiring in May, the policy uncertainty compounds an already unstable picture.
The Reckoning
Here is what the data, taken together, actually shows: a recession that quietly began in the middle of 2025, driven by an accumulation of pressures, tariff-driven inflation, stagnating real wages, a jobs market that stopped growing, consumer savings depleted, and spending retreating to pure survival categories.
The traditional recession declaration requires two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. That confirmation takes time to arrive, and by the time it does, the economy has typically been in contraction for six to eighteen months already. Economists know this. They wait for the official identifiers anyway.
April and May are when the waiting may end. Tax receipts will reveal the true picture of 2025 income and business activity. The March jobs data will be followed by an April report that won’t have a Kaiser strike to blame for weakness. Consumer spending data for the first quarter will arrive without the one-time pull-forward of tariff-anxious purchases that inflated early 2025 numbers.
The data has been building this case for months. The headline numbers have been papering over it. At some point, and that point may be close, the gap between the official story and the lived reality becomes too wide to bridge.
Paper gains are real on a statement. They are not real at the grocery store, at the gas pump, or in the stack of bills that keep arriving regardless of what the S&P 500 does.
The people who matter most to the long-term health of this economy, the working and middle class households who consume, contribute, build, and sustain, have been quietly tightening, withdrawing, and adapting for over a year now. That adjustment has consequences. And consequences, eventually, become data.
The numbers don’t lie. The headlines do. April is when we find out how wide the gap really is.
— April 2026


An estimated 8 million people showed up for the third No Kings protest. Now is the time to build off this momentum by initiating a grassroots campaign to pursue the following. Several Democrats and progressive organizations have compiled separate tax reform proposals. I envision having these proposals consolidated into one bill that will benefit the vast majority of Americans. Such a bill will provide a much-needed alternative tax plan that will counter and expose the corrupt and unjust fiscal endeavors enacted by Republicans. The following is a draft of my proposal.
True Tax Reform 2026: The Sequel:
Increase the current number of tax brackets to create more progressive tax rates on the top 10%, 5%, 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% of income earners.
Create progressive tax rates that will benefit the vast majority of Americans. Compare this with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and H.R. 1 2025.
Richistan: A Journey Through American Wealth and Lives of the New Rich—Robert Frank: Consider income brackets for Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan, including Affluentville and Ultra-Wealthyville—added by Chuck Collins.
Make the federal tax system simpler and more rational.
Enact policies that address excessive CEO compensation. Corporations will be taxed at progressively higher rates based on the income gap between CEO compensation and median worker income.
Enact policies as necessary concerning upside-down subsidies to make them progressive.
Taxpayers subsidize private jet use. Current rates need to be raised substantially by targeting private jet use.
Provide financial relief to individuals adversely affected by higher prices caused by tariffs and caused by the war in Iran. This form of progressive payments could be distributed twice a year for those who qualify. Payments would be distributed similar to how COVID stimulus checks were processed.
Maintain President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act incentives for production in using green energy.
Target measures to protect programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP), to name a few.
Consider expanding and increasing funding for programs such as SNAP and child care that target low-income families.
Republicans are threatening to discontinue some programs that provide much-needed assistance to individuals going to college.
Since 1954, scholarships that provide financial assistance to college students have generally been excluded from taxable income. Ensure this policy continues and protect a host of additional policies that make attending college more affordable.
Increase the corporate tax rate and tax corporations on all profits made in the United States.
Annually raise additional revenue to pay off the entire deficit created by Republican tax reforms of 2017 and 2025 by targeting the ultra-wealthy.
Annually raise additional revenue by targeting the ultra-wealthy to pay off the costs of the war in Iran.
Review and adjust Research and Development (R&D) tax credits.
Enact legislation to make the IRS Direct File permanent and available nationwide.
Decide what actions need to be taken to revise SALT.
Impose financial transaction fees to raise revenue.
Discuss the 20% small business deduction- TCJA 2017 section 199A and consider options.
Increase and make the Child Tax Credit permanent.
Plutocracy Prevention Program:
Design a comprehensive manner to address this issue.
Pursue rules and policies to raise the floor, level the playing field, and break upoverconcentration of wealth.
Pursue efforts that address inequality in wealth and income, including policies to address these inequalities based on race and gender.
Social Security: Create a higher threshold to target those with higher incomes.
Have Social Security benefits be exempt from federal taxes—specifically for low-income and middle-income families.
Pursue and expand a comprehensive approach similar to the "American Housing and Economic Mobility Act" that will provide financial support for homeownership for low-income and middle-class individuals and families.
Pursue efforts to address concerns regarding the size and distribution of intergenerational transfers.
Close the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT) loophole.
Brookings: How Should We Tax the Great Wealth Transfer? (12/12/2024):
Authors report "the size and distribution of intergenerational transfers have raisedconcerns about creating family dynasties, exacerbating trends in inequality, andlimiting economic opportunity and mobility. Authors conclude, "reforms tothe wealth transfer system, including taxing unrealized capital gains at death andconverting the estate tax to an inheritance tax, can raise revenue, increaseprogressivity and improve the economy in other ways as well. "
Institute for Policy Studies: Revenue-Raising Proposals in the Ever-Evolving BuildBack Better Debate (1/25/2022):-
General proposals to raise taxes on high-income individuals. It was mentioned that a bill was approved by the House Ways and Means Committee that included aprovision to mostly reverse the 2017 tax law's cut in the top personal income tax ratefor "ordinary" income (income that is not capital gains or stock dividends subject tospecial tax rates). Democratic lawmakers left the provision out because SenatorKyrsten Sinema reportedly did not support it.
Pursue proposals that aim to limit tax breaks on wealth and income derived from wealth. This includes taxing capital gains as income.
Limit tax breaks for wealthy business owners.
Abolish unjustified tax breaks for the owners of pass-through businesses.
Abolish the special 20% deduction "qualified business income" for large businesses.
Make permanent the limit of pass-through business losses.
Increase taxes on corporations.
Proposals would be designed to ensure that corporate profits do not escape taxation.
Establish a corporate minimum tax rate that requires the biggest corporations to pay progressive federal income taxes on the profits reported to shareholders and create an excise tax on stock buybacks.
Include proposals to limit tax breaks for corporate profit-shifting and offshoring. This includes a reduction in the exemption for offshore profits for so-called "Qualified Business Asset Investments” and increasing the minimum effective tax rate on offshorecorporate profits on a per-country basis.
Proposals to limit tax breaks for wealth and income from wealth:
Repeal several breaks in the estate tax and lower the financial threshold to pay estate taxes.
Replicate successful state programs such as the Massachusetts Fair ShareAmendment and Washington state's Working Family Tax Credit (WFTC) in 2023.
Consolidate These Proposals:
Keep Your Pay Act: Cory Booker
Equal Tax Act: Senators Edward Markey, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Jeff Merkley
Tax Excessive CEO Pay Act: Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Rashida Tlaib
Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act: Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna
Tax on Extreme Wealth and For the 99.8% Act: Senator Bernie Sanders
Working Americans’ Tax Cut Act: Senator Chris Van Hollen and Representative Don Beyer
The Ultra-Millionaires Tax: Senator Elizabeth Warren, Representatives Brendan F. Boyle and Pramila Jayapal
Defund the Oligarchs Resolution: Senator Elizabeth Warren
American Homeownership Act: Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeff Merkley
21st Century ROAD to Housing Act: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Tim Scott
Billionaires Income Tax Act: Senator Ron Wyden and Representatives Donald Beyer and Steve Cohen
The Money Agenda 250: Patriotic Millionaires
The Five & Dime Tax: Tax the Greedy Billionaires
Executive Summary: Excessive Wealth Disorder Institute
Court of International Trade Tariff Refunds: Senators Ron Wyden, Edward J. Markey, and Jeanne Shaheen
The Bipartisan Tax Fairness and Simplification Act of 2011: Senators Ron Wyden and Dan Coates
Publications:
"99 to 1: How Inequality is Wrecking the World and What we can do About it”- Chuck Collins
"Is Inequality Irreversible? The Case for a Maximum Wage”- Chuck Collins and Sam Pizzigati
**** Review provisions in H.R. 1 and executive orders- void and add provisions as needed.